Home   Buzz   Chicago   Ephemera  Etsy  Politics  Pop Culture  RHBH  RHNJ  RHNY  RHOC  Sex  YouTube  WikiLeaks

WHAT YOU'RE MISSING

Carrie Bradshaw

Circumcision: The Haves Vs. The Have-Nots

By Avoine Sauvage

Credit: TrollcatsMEN -- LISTEN UP. There is news in the wide world of circumcision.

On March 4, Thomas Heugel, 56, was arrested and charged with "unauthorized practice as a health professional." He's accused of performing illegal male circumcisions in a bedroom of his Michigan home. And he was networking his -- ahem -- service on sites such as Craigslist and www.adam4adam.com.

All I can say is: at least he had access to local anesthetic for the poor suckers he was slicing.

Meanwhile, over in Massachusetts, lobbyist group Intact America is plugging for a law to ban infant circumcision. The group deems it "unethical, unnecessary, painful, and risky." The problem with the proposed bill is that it doesn't include religious exemption. Thus far, no Massachusetts lawmakers have drank the anti-cutting Kool-Aid.

What a loaded topic!

My friend, a Certified Birth Doula, considers circumcision unnecessary. "I encourage my clients to research it before assuming it is the right choice for them," she explains.

"Choice without information isn't really choice, after all. The risks of circumcision are severely underplayed."

She also finds it ironic that while many of her clients vehemently oppose episiotomy (the process of making an incision in the perineum, which is, in layman's terms, the entrance to the vadge), they are eager and willing to circumcise their male newborns.

"What kind of welcome to the world is it to take a newborn away from his mother, disrupt his learning to nurse, hold him down, and -- with or without anesthesia -- cut off his foreskin?" Although her husband originally wanted their sons to be circumcised, neither of them are. She asks, "Why continue a tradition of welcoming babies into the world with unnecessary surgery?"

This was the reasoning behind another friend's parents' decision to not circumcise him. "They didn't want to traumatize me as an infant," he told me. But when he was 14, he decided that he wanted to say "goodbye" to his foreskin.

"All of my friends were circumcised, along with what seemed like the majority of guys," he said. "I felt like it was supposed to be done." So he was operated on by a doctor (and no, not Mr. Heugel) under local anesthetic. It took him about a month to heal. He says that jizz "clean up" is easier now, and that girls seems to prefer him circumcised. The drawback? Decreased sensitivity.

"It's always rubbing against my boxers now," he explains. "So it takes a lot more to get off."

"So it's like, calloused?" I offered. "Yeah, sort of."


Wanna hear my take?

I remember being 17 and listening to a friend talk about her harrowing experience with an un-snipped schlong. "Tried to give him a BJ," she recounted. "So much skin, I'm telling you! That shit's harder than high school." This sentiment terrified me. What if I met a guy, really liked him, whipped off his skivvies and found a flappy-foreskinned beast?

And then -- sigh -- I finally experienced it. And I'd prefer to never go back. My best friend and I call it the UCD -- the famed and much-coveted uncircumcised dick. Otherwise referred to as "weenie in a blanket," "cub scout in a sleeping bag," and "the uni-bomber," an intact peen, in my opinion, can be a downright delight.

I'll never forget the first time I touched one. The UC man's muscular arms lifted me by the waist and my legs wrapped around his torso. He was me up holding against the side of his house, the rain falling off the awning creating a backdrop behind him. We were makin' out somethin' fierce. My hand reached down behind the waistline of his jeans, into his boxers, and - gasp! - what have we here? A raging boner wrapped in the softest skin I have ever felt. I called my friend immediately when I got in my car to drive home.

"I think he's uncircumcised," I said breathlessly. "Like, the skin's real soft and loose..."
"And amazing?" she asked.

"YES," I emphatically replied.

"Yep, he's definitely uncircumcised," she confirmed, adding, "It's THE BEST."

The UCD and I eventually started banging on the reg. I touched it as often as possible, revelling in its every characteristic. (So much, in fact, I think I weirded the guy out a little.) It wasn't freakish; it wasn't difficult to handle. As a matter of fact, I couldn't even tell a difference -- visually -- when he was hard. But I could tell a difference kinesthetically, and it was fantastic.

I'd also like to add that circumcision is not a health issue. Studies such as ones done at the Mayo Clinic show that there is a slim difference in prevalence of urinary and sexually transmitted infections in circumcised versus uncircumcised men. This of course, depends WHOLLY on the man's ability to maintain a proper level of cleanliness. If you're using condoms and showering daily (or even every other day), you're going to be all right. The "hygiene" argument is an outdated crock of shit.

So in the end, I'm all about personal choice. If it's part of your religious code to circumcise, be my guest. If you have no access to a shower and plan on sticking your tallywhacker in many anonymous partners without a condom, I mean, it won't help much, but maybe consider it. But if not, why not leave the poor penis alone? It's only natural, and frankly, quite pleasurable.

What's your pleasure? Got a problem? Write to Avoine at AvoineSauvage@CrabbyGolightly.com

Tags: Sex

Comments

Yes!! Women speak up! More women should speak up! Please, this is so stupid to cut 30% of a boys penis off at birth...for so many reasons. Circumcised sex is drier and less comfortable for women because there is more friction and less gliding. Speak up!

http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/

You have discovered what most people in the world already know--why European men have the reputation for being good lovers, and American men are considered poor lovers--you can't be a good lover with defective equipment.

If you like dry, abrasive, hard-pounding sex that usually lasts only a few minutes (sometimes thankfully), a circumcised man is right up your alley.

But, if you like smooth, languorous, pleasurable sex, find an intact man.

A study of women who have had both normal and circumcised sex,showed that the overwhelming majority prefer the normal penis for a variety of reasons:

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/

Great post, I really enjoyed reading it. As an aside the preferred term is 'intact'; like "Intact America". "uncircumcised" makes it sound like something wasn't done that should have been which is not the case. But thanks again for a good piece.

Great article. I was circumcised at birth and I am restoring my foreskin. My wife loves my new foreskin. She says it feels great and she loves playing with it. It really makes me wish my parents had left my bits alone when I was born. After all, it is my sex organ, not my parents.

So glad I read this. I am British and feel exactly the same about intact ones - they are so much more fun to suck and play with. But i feel bad for those who've had it taken without permission and i hate to make a man feel bad. So i came up with a good way to make a man feel better about his cut one, after seeing a Muslim guy with horrible scarring from being cut by an aging myopic GP....He said 'you hate my penis' I said (and truthfully) 'I LOVE your penis, he's a WAR HERO'. I think he kind of liked that but it was still negative enough to make sure he doesn't make his son's penis the new Vietnam... xxx

You say it should be a choice, but exactly who should make that choice? Shouldn't the person who owns the penis be able to make that choice? If somebody else makes a decision at birth for him, then it is not his choice. The choice must be make by the person who owns the penis. This means that the circumcision of infants should be banned. Support the Massachusetts bill!

haha, very nice.

but religion isn't an excuse to cut girls why should it be an excuse to cut boys?

Thanks for this honest and excellent piece.

I wish parents could consider the real issues of what they are doing to the man their child will become.

This cutting off of parts of the penis does certainly change the dynamics of the penis and does change sex (for both partners). Give him the opportunity to have natural sex, what we evolved to have.

This cutting off of parts of the penis does take away the persons CAPACITY for PLEASURE for life. A natural source of pleasure is what is removed. This surgery takes away the main male pleasure zones with about 20000 fine touch and stretch nerve endings AMPUTATED.

Post a comment