Home   Buzz   Chicago   Ephemera  Etsy  Politics  Pop Culture  RHBH  RHNJ  RHNY  RHOC  Sex  YouTube  WikiLeaks

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Credit: Tiger Woods Apologizes

Tiger Woods Faces Long Recovery From Playing With Sexual Napalm

By Elizabeth C.

IF PERCEPTION IS EVERYTHING, MAYBE THAT EXPLAINS WHY ON FRIDAY TIGER WOODS appeared fatter, older, balder and much more human.

And contrite, too! Don't forget contrite.

For that was the point of Woods' worldwide apology for detonating his career and family with "sexual napalm,'' to borrow a phrase from John Mayer.

In a carefully crafted apologia delivered in 13:32 minutes, the fallen golf god seemed hellbent on piecing together the shattered shards of his once-mythic life.

But here was something different: he didn't point the finger at anyone else. He didn't blame it on his father's alleged womanizing; he didn't blame it on the enabling behavior of his handlers or the sycophants who surround him. (Though that was evident with just a quick through the audience.

Read "Tiger Woods Fall Prey To The Chase For Magic Pussy here.

Those who were there had the look of employees attending a required staff meeting with the boss.)

"I was unfaithful, I had affairs. I cheated,'' Tiger said unwaveringly. "What I did is not acceptable and I am the only person to blame."

He also chivalrously defended his wife, saying "Elin deserves praise not blame." Which was out of place because even a blind man can see that she is the one figure who has maintained her grace and dignity during Tiger's public relations debacle.

We learned that Tiger's going back to treatment; that he wants his save his marriage; that he will return to golf, maybe even later this year.

And though, as usual, he played this game superiorly, he also rightly said that we can't trust his words alone. "As Elin point out to me, my real apology to her will not come in the form of words. It wil come from my behavior over time."

Already, there are those who smell calculation. "Sorry, but I didn't buy it,'' wrote the Washington Post's Sally Jenkins. The New York Times praised Tiger's disciplined delivery, saying, "His apology may have seemed out of sync with his button-down public demeanor, but it was very much in line with his sportsmanship." And Richard Laermer, the author of Full Frontal PR, told the New York Daily News: "This was so rehearsed, he looked like a cartoon character." And the former PR chief for the New York Yanks dismissed the apology as an "infomercial."

"What I saw was arrogance," Rick Cerone told CNN.

My theory: the jury's still out. No one knows yet if Tiger is sincerely sorry or just handing in a cynical performance. But I read a passage today that defines the difference between winners and losers:

"A winner is one who responds authentically by being credible, trustworthy, responsive, and genuine, both as an individual and as a member of society,'' wrote James Jongeward, author of Born To Win.

"A loser,'' Jongeward asserts, "is one who fails to respond authentically."

If he's faking, the public won't bear the brunt. Tiger will, for having to live with himself.

Read "Deconstructing Tiger: Vanity Fair Delivers Satisfying End To Woods' Downfall" here.

Read "Tiger Woods: Not Black Like Me here.

Tags: Buzz , Tiger Woods

Comments

Okay, caveat: I haven't read/seen the Tiger apology yet.

But speaking of winners and losers: John Tantillo does a weekly winner/loser post on his marketing blog, and when the scandal first broke, he named Tiger a "winner" for the way he handled it.

He also predicted that the scandal wouldn't really hurt Tiger much.... in large part, because his is a performance brand. (That prediction was, I think, before learning that Tiger was planning on stepping away from golf for an indefinite period of time.)

I agree that, in the long run, if Tiger is authentic (either be a womanizer and admit it or be contrite and follow through..), the we'll see his star rise again.

Post a comment